Talent Assessment Tools

Top 25 Talent Assessment Tools in 2021 (& How to Choose One)

Talent Assessments offer valuable insights to HR teams about their candidates and improve talent decision-making. Here we have listed the top 25 talent assessment tools to consider when searching for your assessment needs. To help further, we also explore the benefits of talent assessment tools, the biggest mistake often made when selecting tools, best practices to follow, and how to move into using an assessment marketplace.

Benefits of Talent Assessments

Talent Assessments have long been part of most mid to large-sized companies’ hiring and promotional processes. They come in different uses from the “time-pressured” Cognitive Test Suites to the “discover yourself” Personality Profiles, to the “let’s see what you’ve learned” Skill Test.

With an array of ways to gain insights into candidates even before interviewing them, it comes as no surprise that many companies have adopted Talent Assessments as a mandatory part of their recruitment and talent management process. In fact, as of 2019, 75% of Fortune 500 companies use psychometric testing in recruitment (Independent, 2019). Talent assessment tools have brought significant improvement to 3 critical areas of business:

1. Business Performance

Increase sales, reduce attrition, extend tenure and improve performance. Get the right people in the right roles.

2. Candidate Experience

Win appreciation with branded and gamified assessments in a quick and engaging hiring process.

3. Process Efficiency

Know your metrics and align your talent strategy. Focus on what matters. Easily and seamlessly present results.

Even more impressive to note is companies that have kept a close eye on measuring the impact of Talent Assessments were able to produce objective figures such as:

  • 36% Increase in revenue
  • 40% Reduce in resources
  • 40% Reduce in time-to-hire
  • 25% Increase in tenure

The Single Biggest Mistake in Talent Assessment Practices

With all these impressive benefits it would appear that HR teams could do no wrong when they include Talent Assessment tools as part of their core talent processes.

However, even the best-trained HR teams often end up making one of the biggest mistakes in Talent Assessment practices – onboarding too many Talents Assessment tools. Just like we often over-indulge in desserts because they taste good, only to later suffer, so do HR teams often end up having too many tools and thereby diluting the original purpose.

Talent Assessment Practices


Even the best-trained HR teams often end up making one of the biggest mistakes in Talent Assessment practices

Negative Effects of Having Too Many Assessment Tools

If Talent Assessments hold that much benefit, what could possibly be the negative effects of onboarding multiple tools?

Let’s explore the 3 key negative effects of having multiple assessment tools:

1. Significant increase in costs

The 1st problem is obvious, yet many HR teams still spend redundantly on tools and providers, directly contributing to an increase in assessment costs often by 2 to 3 times, and in turn impacting the bottom-line.

Why would they do that? Often decisions are triggered because of a new buzzword or trend in the Talent Assessment market, which drives a company to rush and onboard another tool in addition to their existing portfolio of assessments, without consideration of long-term use, impact, and cost.

In addition to the above, certain tools or providers may also include a hidden cost that only becomes clear as testing volume grows. The real impact is felt when the business asks HR to defend these costs and as the redundancy becomes apparent, what do you think happens to next year’s budgets?

2. Significant increase in execution time

The 2nd problem is not hard to imagine. Your company has onboarded its 5th Talent Assessment provider because of which your team will need to be trained on new tools and reports, thereby increasing the time needed for training. Building further on this – as Talent teams hand Managers a new report, which has a different format from the ones they have been using previously, more confusion arises.

Finally, significant manual effort and time spent on collating data from multiple reports to convert that into a single source of truth. This of course also carries the risk of manual errors creeping into the data. All this has already stretched your time, making you miss your KPI targets.

So, remember that every new tool, report, or provider necessitates in-depth knowledge and training, or else results will not be optimum.

3. Too much data, no information

A Forrester report stated that between 60% to 73% of all data within an enterprise goes unused for analytics. This includes talent assessment tools data that often gets collected but does not get turned into information.

Having multiple assessment tools often causes data to be plentiful, but too varied for HR to turn into meaningful information and insights needed for effective decision making. This is mainly caused by each tool having its own logic behind the data leading to conflict of data points and therefore HR not being able to draw a definite conclusion.

Top 25 Talent Assessment Tools List

talent assessment tools


Top global talent assessment tools to consider in your talent process

Here is a compiled list of global talent assessment tools to consider implementing in your talent processes.

  1. Accendo
  2. Applied
  3. Mercer | Mettl
  4. Adface
  5. Aspiring Minds
  6. Codility
  7. HackerRank
  8. Criteria
  9. Harrison Assessments
  10. Cubiks
  11. HireSelect
  12. SHL
  13. Cappafinity (Koro)
  14. Testdome
  15. Thrivemap
  16. Pymetrics
  17. HR Avatar
  18. Plum
  19. Skillsarena
  20. Predictive Index
  21. The English Quiz
  22. Harver
  23. Hogan Assessments
  24. HireMojo
  25. Hirevue

3 Best Practices to Follow in Tool Selection

Now that we have seen the varying options of tools available, we will identify 3 steps HR teams can take to avoid falling into this trap.

1. Clearly identify what needs to be measured

A recent study by McKinsey & Co rightly stated that “Simple advice—if there isn’t direct science linking the assessment to job performance or to the characteristic you’ve determined matters for the job in question, don’t use it.” HR teams must start by clearly identifying what factors will tell them if a candidate will or will not be a right fit for the role in question.

These factors can include anything that will predict performance such as leadership traits, technical skills, cultural alignment, cognitive ability, etc. Only once this has been set should HR start to evaluate assessments tools that are able to accurately measure the criterion set, thereby increasing the relevancy of each tool.

By practicing this, your HR team may find that having 4-5 types of assessments should be able to cover all testing needs.

2. Customize and Contextualize Outputs

Often, the journey leading into onboarding multiple tools doesn’t begin with the search for a better test, but a search for a better output. Many talent assessments today have reached similar levels of validity, making differences in input very minimal. With test validity being standardized and controlled by industry bodies, assessments have now turned their attention to improving outputs.

The toughest job HR teams have in the introduction of a new talent assessment tool is to convince business managers that this new assessment will give them better results. The biggest challenge stems from the fact that talent assessment outputs generally speak a more psychological language that is unfamiliar to business managers. HR’s strategy to win this is to work with talent assessment tools that can customize and contextualize their outputs to language familiar to their organization.

By using terms familiar to the business (e.g., internal frameworks) and avoiding jargon when producing assessment outputs will increase the familiarity effect and increase adoption rates by the business.

3. Consolidate when multiple tools are unavoidable

With many organizations going through transformation and diversification, the need for evaluating varied and complex types of traits and skills leads to multiple tools becoming unavoidable. When faced with this situation, HR teams should always search for talent assessment tools that can consolidate output as far as possible.

This will ensure that problems 2 and 3 either do not occur, or their impact is minimized.

Additionally, with data interpretation and consolidation being done by AI-driven platforms today, insights produced can be more in-depth and non-conflicting, which is a big challenge when done manually.

How To Consolidate Talent Assessment Tools – Assessment Marketplace

Much like Airbnb aggregates property rentals, an assessment marketplace brings together various types of assessments and gives HR teams the liberty to choose assessments based on their measurement needs, assessment purpose, and budgets. Larger organizations have found it tough in the past to manage their assessment process, results, and contracts when using more than 1 tool.

HR teams that have used assessment marketplaces typically experience 4 key benefits.

  1. Greater visibility on talents as they are assessed more holistically
  2. Greater control over HR expenditure
  3. Process efficiency in acquisition and talent management
  4. A reduction in manpower effort

To find the right assessment marketplace, HR needs to look for 3 key features to be present:

  1. A choice of assessments
  2. A holistic approach to measurement
  3. Data consolidation capability
Talent Assessment Marketplace
How To Consolidate Talent Assessment Tools – Assessment Marketplace

1. A Choice of Assessments

Talent assessments today vary by many factors such as measurement outcome, candidate experience, job levels, etc. hence it becomes beneficial to HR to have a marketplace in which choices of assessment tools are available. This allows HR to set up testing very quickly for any purpose they may have instead of needing to start a new search and purchase process each time.

Here are some examples of varying testing scenarios in which having an assessment marketplace would help tremendously.

Varying measurement criteria: Many projects call for measuring different criteria or measuring a combination of criteria.

Criteria influencing talent decisions include leadership potential, agility, cultural alignment, engagement, technical competence, digital readiness, sales proficiency, and such. Each of these criteria of measurement requires different tools and trying to measure a combination of criteria such as a person’s leadership potential, agility, and cultural alignment concurrently requires an assessment marketplace.

Varying candidate experience: HR teams serve a wide variety of audiences and therefore need to always be prepared to create different candidate experiences.

An assessment marketplace creates the perfect opportunity to do this as it houses the more traditional psychometrics for more serious candidate experiences, game-based assessments for more engaging and exciting candidate experiences, and simulations for more immersive experiences.

Varying job levels: One of the toughest challenges in assessment management is building and maintaining a process across multiple job levels.

Large organizations tend to have assessment processes across as many as 7 – 8 job levels, from graduate-level hiring to C-Suite testing. HR’s role in this process is to ensure assessments meet the appropriate level of measurement for each of these levels whilst having a central management platform.

The assessment marketplace ensures this happens in one central location.

2. A Holistic Approach to Measurement

An assessment marketplace provides a holistic way to measure talents by considering different lenses made possible by combining multiple types of assessments.

These lenses give HR true insights into the gaps and strengths of an employee, empowering HR to make more accurate talent decisions. Talent acquisition can make use of the marketplace measures by improving hiring accuracy thereby increasing speed to performance. Talent management, on the other hand, can make better promotional decisions, increase employee movements within the organization, and plan for hyper-personalized development programs.

The approach in the Accendo assessment marketplace is to view talents, internal and external via a Holistic Tri-Factor under 3 lenses: preference, behavior in action, and context.

By combining multiple assessment tools, the holistic tri-factor can provide companies with in-depth details about a person’s personal preference, their ability to display that preference at work, and how well they can contextualize that preference in your organization.

This method of assessment and measurement truly investigates a person’s competency proficiency and provides a complete picture. For example, if a candidate has shown a natural preference toward Strategic Thinking (preference assessed through psychometrics), can she display Strategic Thinking in a work environment (behavior in action assessed through simulations).

And lastly, will she be able to apply Strategic Thinking in your organization (context assessed through a Video Interview). This then completes her measure against the holistic tri-factor.

3. Data Consolidation Capability

Having a central location to manage assessments and a framework to view candidates more holistically is only one of the problems solved. The biggest challenges HR still faces when dealing with multiple tools and measures is bringing together data points collected easily, yet still makes sense without redundancy. This is where the feature of data consolidation in an assessment marketplace plays a big role.

A good data consolidation feature brings together interpretations of talent assessment scores to create a coherent story to help make talent decisions. This feature of an assessment marketplace also helps HR create a larger buy-in from the business for using talent assessments. Traditionally, talent assessment data remains unconnected and incoherent, and therefore businesses find it hard to interpret this themselves, and therefore they usually fall back to gutfeel.

With consolidated data that offers a business manager the full picture, while highlighting blind spots, they start understanding the value of talent assessments and start supporting HR in the talent process. Much like how Airbnb gives consumers flexibility in choosing from a variety of rental properties suitable to their needs all in one place by aggregating information.

An assessment marketplace gives HR flexibility and adaptability by containing multiple types of assessments; it sharpens HR’s eyesight by having a holistic view of talent and it gains business buy-in by providing consolidated reports.

Interested in knowing how a single integrated platform can help you consolidate multiple data points from talent assessments to make better talent decisions? Send an email today to [email protected]

Liked This Blog Information?

We have a lot more where that came from! Join 2,909,987 subscribers who stay ahead of the pack.

Comments are closed.